1. Pruritus Cesarean Delivery Fentanyl Dosis 10 15 2015
2. Pruritus Cesarean Delivery Fentanyl Dosis 10 15 2016
3. Pruritus Cesarian Delivery Fentanyl Dosis 10 15 20 Years Of Love

Chang Gung Med J Vol. 2 March-April 2011 Chia-Chih Liao, et al Nalbuphine for pruritus 173 piratory depression.(1-3) Pruritus is the most common side effect with a reported incidence of 58–85%. INTRATHECAL FENTANYL ADDED TO LIDOCAINE FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY UNDER SPINAL ANESTHESIA M.E.J. ANESTH 19 (2), 2007 403 SHAHRIARI A The sedation score 3 was seen in 80% of patients in Fentanyl group versus 20% of patients in Control group (p Pruritus or postdural headache or backache was not seen in any.

Abstract

Pruritus is a troublesome side-effect of neuraxial (epidural and intrathecal) opioids. Sometimes it may be more unpleasant than pain itself. The prevention and treatment still remains a challenge. A variety of medications with different mechanisms of action have been used for the prevention and treatment of opioid-induced pruritus, with mixed results. The aim of this article is to review the current body of literature and summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms and the pharmacological therapies available to manage opioid-induced pruritus. The literature source of this review was obtained via PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until 2012. The search results were limited to the randomized controlled trials, systemic reviews and non-systemic reviews.

Introduction

Neuraxial opioids are one of the most frequently used methods of analgesia after cesarean delivery and other surgical procedures. The beneficial effect of neuraxial opioids used either alone or in combination with the local anesthetics is to augment and prolong intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. A wide range of side-effects has been reported, out of which one is pruritus.[]

Pruritus, a subjective unpleasant and irritating sensation that provokes an urge to scratch and the symptoms typically start at the trunk, nose, around the eyes and is usually localized to facial areas, innervated by the trigeminal nerve.[] The spinal nucleus of the trigeminal nerve is rich in opioid receptors and is continuous with the substantia gelatinosa and Lissauer tract at C3-C4.[] The ophthalmic division of the spinal sensory nucleus of the trigeminal nerve is most inferior; thus, supporting the observation that the pruritus following neuraxial opioid administration is typically in the nose and upper part of the face.[]

The objective of this review is to understand the pathophysiology and mechanism of opioid-induced pruritus and review the current body of literature for evidence available for pharmacological therapies to manage opioid-induced pruritus.

Incidence and prevalence

The incidence of pruritus is 83% in postpartum patients and 69% in non-pregnant patients including males and females.[,] Pregnant women seem to be more susceptible to pruritus after neuraxial opioid administration than other populations, with incidence of 60-100%.[,] In contrast, after orthopedic surgery, the incidence of pruritus after intrathecal opioid ranged from 30% to 60%.[,] This increased incidence may be due to an interaction of estrogen with opioid receptors.[,]

Pruritus begins shortly after analgesia, with the onset depending on the type, route and dosage of opioid used. Pruritus invoked by lipid-soluble opioids such as fentanyl and sufentanil is of shorter duration, and the use of the minimum effective dose and addition of local anesthetics seems to decrease the prevalence and the severity of itching. Pruritus invoked by intrathecal morphine is of longer duration and is difficult to treat.[] Intrathecal administration, of opioids reach peak concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid almost immediately.[,] After epidural administration, there is a delay in the rise to peak concentration (10-20 min with fentanyl and 1-4 h with morphine).[,] Co-administration of epinephrine may have an influence on spinal and epidural opioid-induced side-effects, including pruritus. As a vasoconstrictor agent, epinephrine decreases the vascular uptake of the opioid from the spinal and epidural space, increasing opioid concentrations within the cerebrospinal fluid and therefore, possibly increasing the severity of side-effects.[,]

Mechanism of neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus

The exact mechanism of neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus is unclear. Many mechanisms have been postulated, but no single mechanism can explain all instances.

Postulated mechanisms include:[,]

• The presence of “itch center” in the central nervous system

• Medullary dorsal horn activation and antagonism of inhibitory transmitters

• Modulation of the serotonergic pathway

• Theory linking pain and pruritus.

It appears pain and pruritus are transmitted by the same population of sensory neurons, namely small un-myelinated nerve fibers (C-fibers) and the release of prostaglandins (PGE1 and PGE2) enhance C-fiber transmission to the central nervous system, which potentiates pruritus.[]

A high density of 5-hydroxytryptamine subtype 3 (5-HT3) receptor and μ receptors are present in the superficial layers of the dorsal horn and in the nucleus of the spinal tract of the trigeminal nerve in the medulla. The spinal trigeminal nucleus located superficially in the medulla is an integrative center for sensory input from the face and an area known as the “itch center.” The Cephalic migration of neuraxial opioids toward this “itch center and activation of 5-HT3 receptors by opioids may play a role in the generation of neuraxial opioid-induced pruritis.[,]

Opioids can also induce itching at the spinal level by “itch-selective” secondary neurons in the lamina I spino-thalamic tract of the dorsal horn. The active wide dynamic range or nociception-specific neurons of the dorsal horn inhibit these spinal itch neurons. If this inhibition is weakened by opioids, the disinhibited itch neurons become active and mediate itching, without stimulation of the primary afferent peripheral nerves.[] Spinal triggering of itching is observed in particular by activation of μ-opioid receptors (MOR) although κ-opioid receptors (KOR) suppress itch.[,]

Prevention and treatment of opioid-induced pruritus

Treatment of neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus remains a challenge. It is often difficult to treat and is refractory to conventional antipruritic treatment. Several drugs have been tried with some evidence of efficacy. The pharmacological therapies including antihistamines, 5-HT3-receptor antagonists, opiate-antagonists, propofol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and droperidol have been studied.

5-HT3 receptor antagonist

5-HT3 receptors are abundant in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and the spinal tract of the trigeminal nerve in the medulla. The interaction between opioids and 5-HT3 receptors may play a role in the generation of neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus.[,] 5-HT3 antagonists, such as ondansetron, granisetron, and dolasetron have been used to prevent the neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus.

Systematic review of 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicates that prophylactic treatment with a single i.v. bolus of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists may provide a significant decrease in the incidence and the intensity score of pruritus after neuraxial opioid administration, particularly when morphine is used. It also suggested a significant decrease in the requirement for treatment of pruritis.[] Dosage for the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists used were ondansetron four, and 8 mg, or 0.1 mg kg.[] The other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists studied are Tropisetron (5 mg), granisetron (3 mg), and dolasetron (12.5 mg).

5-HT3 receptor antagonists reduced the incidence of pruritus after neuraxial morphine injection but not after neuraxial lipid-soluble opioids injection. One of the postulated mechanism is Morphine is less lipid-soluble and slow in the onset of analgesia, which gives higher residual opioid concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid and a greater cephalic migration.[] As the peak concentration of ondansetron, occurs around 15 min, 5-HT3 antagonists may reach 5-HT3 receptors in the spinal cord before morphine, but not after the lipid-soluble drugs.[,]

Opioid receptor antagonist

The μ receptor is responsible for pain modulation and some side-effects, especially pruritus and nausea or vomiting. Pre-treatment with clocinamox, a selective MOR antagonist inhibited intrathecal morphine-induced scratching in primates, but neither κ-opioid (binaltorphimine) nor δ-opioid receptor antagonists (naltrindole) produced this effect. This explained the antipruritic effect of μ receptor antagonists.[] Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness of naloxone, naltrexone and methyl naltrexone in the prevention of opioid induced pruritus, but mixed results were seen. Based on the existing data, a low dose, continuous i.v. infusion of naloxone has the largest body of evidence supporting its use for prevention of opioid induced pruritus in adult. A continuous infusion produces less fluctuation of naloxone concentrations than bolus injections and compensates for naloxone's relatively short half-life. It appears that an intravenous dose of 0.25-1 μg/kg/h is the most effective without affecting analgesia.[] A systematic review by Kjellberg and Tramèr[] concluded that doses above 2 μg/kg/h. are more likely to lead to reversal of analgesia and thus are not recommended.

Mixed agonist – antagonist opioid

Mixed agonist – antagonist opioid has a potential to attenuate the μ-opioid effects and to enhance the κ-opioid effects. There is experimental evidence suggesting that activation of KOR attenuated morphine-induced itching without interfering with nociception in monkeys.[] Studies have demonstrated that both MOR antagonists and - KOR agonists are effective in alleviating intrathecal morphine induced itch in primates.[,] Effectiveness of nalbuphine, butorphanol, and pentazocine has also been studied with positive results.[,]

Tamdee et al. performed a randomized trial to study the efficacy of pentazocine for the treatment of pruritus associated with intrathecal injection of morphine and concluded that pentazocine 15 mg is superior to ondansetron 4 mg for the treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.[]

Mixed agonist – antagonist opioid effectively prevents and treats opioid-induced pruritus without increasing pain, but the treatment may be complicated by increased drowsiness.[] However, a recent study suggested that nalbuphine is not effective in the treatment of post-operative opioid-induced pruritus in the pediatric patients.[]

NSAIDs

NSAIDs have a well-recognized role in the relief of postoperative pain. They inhibit cyclooxygenases and decrease the formation of prostaglandins.

Tenoxicam and diclofenac have been shown to have anti-pruritic effects in patients receiving neuraxial opioids.[,] However, Gulhas et al.[] found no decrease in pruritus with the use of Lornoxicam following intrathecal fentanyl administration. Celecoxib have shown mixed results in having anti-pruritic effects. Lee et al.[] found no reduction of pruritus with the use of celecoxib following intrathecal morphine administration. Their study failed to demonstrate any significant antipruritic or analgesic effects of celecoxib in a single dose of 200 mg (administered after delivery of baby) within the first 24 h post-operatively but Samimi et al.[47] used 400 mg celecoxib orally 1 h before surgery and showed the effectiveness of celecoxib in decreasing the incidence of Intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.

Antihistamines

H1 blockers have little or no effect on centrally induced pruritus; although, first-generation H1 receptor antagonists such as diphenhydramine or hydroxyzine may produce a sedative effect, which could sometimes, be helpful in patients with pruritus. They primarily interrupt the itch-scratch cycle by providing needed sleep but are not really effective at reducing the severity of the itch.[]

Propofol

Propofol has been used for the treatment and prevention of pruritus. It exerts its antipruritic action through the inhibition of the posterior horn transmission in the spinal cord.[,] Many studies have been carried out with the sub-hypnotic propofol doses ranging from 10 mg bolus to 30 mg over 24 h, but results were conflicting.[,]

Mirtazapine

Mirtazapine is a new antidepressant that selectively blocks 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors. Mirtazapine has a unique pharmacological profile apart from increasing noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission; mirtazapine can exert its antidepressant and anti-nociception action through the κ-opioid system-opioid system.[,] Its antipruritic activity was first reported by Davis et al.[] Sheen et al. studied Mirtazapine to reduce intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.[] They concluded that pre-operative oral mirtazapine 30 mg decreased the incidence, delayed the onset time, decreased the severity, and shortened the duration of pruritus. Mirtazapine could exert its antipruritic effect through activating the κ-opioid system. Secondly, mirtazapine can work on the cerebral cortex to reduce the perception of pruritus. Thirdly, mirtazapine had strong antihistamine effect. From the pharmacokinetic viewpoint, mirtazapine has another advantage over the first-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. The peak concentration of mirtazapine is reached 2 h. after a single dose and the elimination half-life ranges from 20 h to 40 h.[] allowing the drug to cover the onset and duration of pruritus.

Dopamine D2 receptor antagonist

Droperidol and alizapride has also been used for the treatment of opioid-induced pruritus. Both are potent dopamine D2 receptor antagonist. Droperidol is also having weak anti-5-HT3 activity. In the study by Horta et al.[] involving 300 women undergoing cesarean section, the intravenous droperidol subgroup showed the lowest prevalence of pruritus compared with placebo and also compared with propofol, alizapride, and promethazine. Metoclopramide, another dopamine D2 receptor antagonist has been shown to be ineffective in this regard.[]

Gabapentin

Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant, a structural analog of γ-amino butyric acid. Several studies have shown gabapentin to be effective in in many chronic pruritus conditions.[,] Sheen et al. studied the role of gabapentin in the management of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.[] They concluded that pre-operative gabapentin 1200 mg decreased the incidence, delayed the onset time, decreased the severity, and shortened the duration of intrathecal morphine pruritus and it may be due to the multimodal anti pruritic action of gabapentin that includes central reduction of itch perception,[] modulatory action on transmitter release,[] which reduce the excitability of spinal and supraspinal neurons during itch transmission and spinal-supraspinal inhibition of serotonergic circuits.[] Recently, Chiravanich et al. has carried out RCT on single dose of gabapentin as prophylaxis for intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus in orthopedic surgery.[] They Concluded that pre-operative gabapentin 600 mg did not significantly reduces the post-operative intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus. Therefore, the effectiveness of antipruritic dosage and the other pharmacological mechanisms of gabapentin need further study.

Prevention

The treatment of neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus is complex even after, significant research in these fields. We yet fail to describe a definitive treatment. Believing that prevention is better than cure and we suggest the use of minimal analgesic doses of neuraxial opioids, use of neuraxial opioids in combination with a local anesthetic, which offers satisfactory analgesia with a very low incidence of pruritus.[] Drugs such as Tenoxicam, rectal diclofenac, pre-operative oral gabapentin, intravenous 5-HT3 antagonists, droperidol and subhypnotic dose of propofol have shown positive results for prevention of neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus and therefore, may be considered as possible prophylactic therapy.

Conclusion

Pruritus is a well-recognized adverse effect of neuraxial opioids. It may have an impact on patient comfort, quality of life, and willingness to continue opioid therapy. Mechanism of intrathecal opioid-induced pruritus is complex and the literature data on the pathogenesis is still not clear. Many treatments have been tried, but to date, the data are conflicting and only limited studies have confirmed their efficacy. MOR antagonists, mixed opioid receptor agonist-antagonists, serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, and D2 receptor antagonists have been demonstrated most consistent in terms of attenuating opioid-induced pruritus.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

Abstract

Background:

Intrathecal morphine provides effective postoperative analgesia, but their use is associated with numerous side effects, including pruritus, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, and respiratory depression. Pruritus is the most common side effect with a reported incidence of 58–85%.

Objectives:

This prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study was performed for women scheduled for cesarean delivery using spinal anesthesia to compare nalbuphine and ondansetron in the prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.

Patients and Methods:

Ninety women after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine patients randomly divided into three groups. Women in placebo group (P group) received 4 ml of normal saline intravenous (IV) injection, nalbuphine group (N group) received 4 ml of a 4 mg nalbuphine IV injection, and ondansetron 4 group (O group) received 4 ml of a 4 mg ondansetron IV injection, immediately after delivery of the baby. Studied women observed in postanesthesia care unit for 4 h. The primary outcome measures success of the treatment, defined as a pruritus score 1 (no pruritus) or 2 (mild pruritus - no treatment required) at 20 min after treatment.

Results:

Although, three was no significant difference between the three studied groups regarding; score 1 pruritus, while, score 2 pruritus (mild pruritus - no treatment requested) was significantly high in N and O groups compared to placebo group. Pruritus score 1 (no pruritus) plus pruritus score 2 were significantly high in N and O groups compared to placebo group (20 cases, 20 cases, 5 cases; respectively, P = 0.008). In addition; score 3 pruritus (moderate - treatment requested) was significantly less in N and O groups compared to placebo group.

Conclusion:

Nalbuphine and ondansetron were found to be more effective than placebo for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus in women undergoing cesarean delivery and nalbuphine is preferred than ondansetron because it is not excreted in the breast milk.

INTRODUCTION

Intrathecal morphine provides effective postoperative analgesia, but their use is associated with numerous side effects, including pruritus, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, and respiratory depression.[,]

Pruritus is the most common side effect with a reported incidence of 58–85%.[,] It is a subjective unpleasant and irritating sensation that provokes an urge to scratch which is usually localized.[]

The exact mechanism of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus is unclear. More than one mechanism may be responsible for the development of this unpleasant symptom.[]

Pruritus prevention and treatment remains a strong challenge for all anesthesiologists. Many drugs have used to prevent or to treat this side effect. Naloxone can effectively treat the pruritus even in severe cases, but it may do so at the expense of the analgesic effect.[]

Other drugs as antihistamines, 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) (serotonin) receptor antagonists, opioid antagonists, opioid agonist-antagonists, propofol, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been used.[,]

Nalbuphine is an opioid agonist-antagonist and its analgesic and possible antipruritic effects are mediated via actions on the μ- and κ-receptors.[]

Many studies have noted the efficacy of intravenous (IV) nalbuphine in treating opioid-induced pruritus without reversal of analgesia or other significant side effects.[,]

Ondansetron, a selective serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist,[] commonly used for nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy and morphine-induced itching.

Several studies have shown that ondansetron is effective in treating pruritus of various causes; including intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.[,]

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study was performed from March 2014 to March 2015, at Ahmadi Hospital, Kuwait Oil Company, Kuwait. After approval of the Institute Ethical Committee and after written consent from all studied women. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II nonbreast feeding women scheduled for cesarean delivery using spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine recruited for this study. Women who had known allergy to ondansetron, morphine, or bupivacaine and those with a preexisting pruritus due to pregnancy or a coexisting skin disorders or any other pruritogenic systemic diseases excluded from this study.

Women with inadequate spinal anesthesia necessitating conversion to general anesthesia also excluded.

No premedication given and all women hydrated with 500–1000 ml of normal saline solution before administration of spinal anesthesia. The subarachnoid block performed with patients in the left lateral position at either L3-4 or L4-5 interspace level, per our standard practice, with a 25-or 27-gauge Quincke spinal needle (Becton, Dickinson and Company, New Jersey, USA).

Once free flow of clear cerebrospinal fluid had demonstrated, 2.2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.2 ml (0.2 mg) of preservative-free morphine, mixed in the same syringe, injected. Studied women then immediately placed in the supine position with left uterine displacement and supplemental oxygen delivered usingfacemask at 5 L/min.

After a satisfactory spinal block verified by loss of sensation to cold or pinprick, caesarean delivery performed.

Studied women randomly divided into three groups. Women in placebo group (P group) received 4 ml of normal saline IV injection, nalbuphine group (N group) received 4 ml of a 4-mg nalbuphine (Nubain; Dupont Pharma, Manati, Puerto Rico) IV injection, and ondansetron 4 group (O group) received 4 ml of a 4 mg ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Wellcome, Greenford, UK) IV injection, immediately after delivery of the baby. The block randomization sequence selected according to a random number table that wrote on a paper enclosed in a sealed envelope. Randomly, allocated coded syringes prepared by a nurse anesthetist not involved in the study and drugs administered in a double-blinded fashion.

In the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), vital signs recorded every 20 min for 4 h. Data collected by a single investigator. Women observed for scratching and its location. The degree of pruritus was evaluated at 20 min intervals by asking about the presence and severity of pruritus and whether treatment was desired (1 no pruritus, 2 mild pruritus - treatment not requested, 3 moderate pruritus - treatment requested, and 4 severe pruritus - treatment requested). Pruritus scores, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation recorded every 20 min intervals.

Verbal numeric pain score (0 no pain to 10 worst imaginable pain) and 4-point sedation score (1 fully awake, 2 somnolent - responds to voice, 3 somnolent - responds to tactile stimulation, and 4 asleep - responds to pain). Also, 4-point rating scale for nausea and vomiting (1 no nausea nor vomiting, 2 queasy, 3 severe nausea, and 4 vomiting) and a 4-point rating scale for shivering (1 no shivering, 2 mild shivering - treatment not necessary, 3 moderate shivering - treatment desirable, and 4 severe shivering - treatment desirable) recorded. The primary outcome measures success of the treatment, defined as a pruritus score 1 (no pruritus) or 2 (mild pruritus - no treatment required) at 20 min after treatment. Studied women evaluated every 20 min for 4 h postoperative to determine the duration of the antipruritic response. In absence of positive response (pruritus score of 3 or 4), result was considered as a treatment failure and those whose pruritus scores continued to be 3 or more were rescued with IV naloxone divided doses (10–20 µg).

Tramadol 0.5 mg/kg was prescribed for shivering when needed, also tramadol 1 mg/kg was administered for pain control (if pain score is more than 5 or on patient's request).

After each drug administration, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, dizziness, extrapyramidal effects, mood changes, presence of hallucination, other adverse effects and the onset of pruritus recorded. Demographic and surgical characteristics of studied women also recorded. The study ended after 4 h of postoperative observation and after shift of the participants to the ward.

Justification and statistical analysis

Using data from previous studies and Epi Info^® version 6.0, a sample size of 90 women was needed to produce a significant difference. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences); computer software version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Mean and standard deviation were used to represent numerical variables, while, number and percentage were used to represent categorical variables. Student's t-test was used for analysis of quantitative data, Chi-square (χ²) test for analysis of qualitative data. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Ninety-four women enrolled in the study. Four patients excluded due to failure of spinal anesthesia. There was no statistical significant difference between studied groups regarding; demographic data, operative time, and onset of pruritus Tables ​Tables11 and ​and22.

Table 2

Operative time and onset of pruritus in studied groups

Regarding pruritus score in PACU, there was 2 women with no pruritus, 3 mild, 24 moderate, and 1 with severe pruritus in P group, while 7 women with no pruritus, 13 mild, 9 moderate, and one with severe pruritus in N group. In addition, 6 women with no pruritus, 14 mild, 8 moderate, and two with severe pruritus in O group [Table 3].

Although, three was no significant difference between the three studied groups regarding score 1 pruritus, while, score 2 pruritus (mild pruritus - no treatment requested) was significantly high in N and O groups compared to placebo group.

Pruritus score 1 (no pruritus) plus pruritus score 2 (mild pruritus - no treatment required) were significantly high in N and O groups compared to placebo group (20 cases, 20 cases, 5 cases; respectively, P = 0.008). In addition; score 3 pruritus (moderate - treatment requested) was significantly less in N and O groups compared to placebo group [Table 3].

Severe pruritus was similar with no significant difference between the three studied groups [Table 3].

The distribution of pruritus was mainly in the trunk, back, neck, and around the nose and eyes. Most of women with moderate pruritus in the three studied groups treated (when they asked for) successfully with IV 10–20 µg naloxone.

Nausea/vomiting, sedation, shivering, and pain scores at the PACU were similar in all studied groups. With no significant difference [Table 4].

DISCUSSION

Neuraxial opioid analgesia is one of the significant breakthroughs in pain management, and spinal morphine is one of the most frequently used methods of analgesia after cesarean delivery and other surgical procedures.

This study demonstrated an incidence of pruritus of 90%, which was high and consistent with other studies.[,]

Pruritus Cesarean Delivery Fentanyl Dosis 10 15 2015

Pregnant women seem to be more susceptible to pruritus after neuraxial opioid administration than other populations.[,]

A recent systemic review revealed that the mean incidence of pruritus is 83% in postpartum patients and 69% in nonpregnant patients including males and females.[] Possible explanations are increased cephalic spread of spinally administered drug[] and interaction of estrogen with the opioid receptors has been suggested.[]

Studied women kept for 4 h in the PACU, because pruritus onset usually occurs within a few hours of intrathecal morphine injection.[]

The onset of pruritus in this study ranged from 30 to 180 min, which is also consistent with other previous studies.[]

The mechanism of intrathecal opioid-induced pruritus not fully understood. It is probably not related to histamine release, because antihistamines are ineffective in the therapy of pruritus caused by spinal morphine.[]

One hypothesis stated that pruritus is likely due to cephalad migration of neuraxial opioids to the medulla where the “itch center” is thought to be located and where they interact with the trigeminal nucleus.[,] Another theory stated that the pain pathway and pruritus are transmitted by the same small unmyelinated sensory nerve fibers (C fibers).[]

The most commonly cited theory that pruritus mediated by µ-opioid receptors, which are responsible for pain modulation and some side effects, especially pruritus and nausea or vomiting.

This would explain the antipruritic effect of nalbuphine or naloxone, because both of them are specific antagonists.[]

Naloxone's reversibility of opioid-induced pruritus supports the existence of an opioid receptor mediated central mechanism.[]

However, the use of naloxone for the treatment of pruritus is limited to low doses, because high doses of naloxone may reverse the analgesic effect of opioids. Specifically, the 5-HT3 receptor has implicated and this stimulated interest in investigating the potential for the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists to reduce the incidence of intrathecal morphine complication. One study investigated the use of ondansetron for the treatment of established pruritus and reported that it was more effective than placebo.[]

Although, Chiravanich et al., concluded in their randomized controlled trial that a preoperative gabapentin 600 mg did not significantly reduces the postoperative intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.[,]

Bonnet et al.,[] who published a quantitative systematic review of the efficacy of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prophylaxis of neuraxial opioids (morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil) induced pruritus in patients undergoing a wide variety of surgical procedure and labor. They concluded that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists were effective in reducing the incidence of pruritus, also recently Koju et al., concluded that prophylactic administration of ondansetron to parturient receiving intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia provides a significant reduction of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus and nausea and vomiting.[]

Previous report conducted by George et al., for the prophylaxis against neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus and they concluded that the incidence of pruritus was reduced with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists.[31]

In addition, Borgeat and Stirnemann[] reported that ondansetron was effective for the treatment of spinal or epidural morphine-induced pruritus in a randomized, double-blinded study of 100 patients.

Yeh et al.[] and Charuluxananan et al.,[] demonstrated that prophylactic ondansetron reduced the frequency of subarachnoid morphine-related pruritus in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. These conflicting results may attributed to the different doses of subarachnoid morphine administered, different scales and definitions used, as well as different periods for assessment.[] Unlike nalbuphine, ondansetron is lipophilic and may excreted in breast milk, but there are no reports defining the concentration of this drug in breast milk. Therefore, ondansetron not currently recommended for routine use in breastfeeding mothers, which may limit its use in patients undergoing cesarean delivery until further data are available.[] Use of nalbuphine would be associated with a somewhat larger cost of care, which balanced by increased patient satisfaction due to decrease incidence of pruritus.

Many studies also showed that κ-receptor agonists inhibit neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus.[] Nalbuphine is a mixed opioid κ-agonist and μ-antagonist. This would explain its antipruritic effect via action on the μ- and κ-receptors. In previous studies, IV nalbuphine (2–3 mg) was proven optimal in the treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean section without increased pain scores or other side effects.[,]

On the other hand, doses of 4 mg of nalbuphine and 4 mg of ondansetron were chosen because these doses had proven successful in the treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.[,]

Yeh et al., revealed that 4 mg of nalbuphine and 4 mg of ondansetron were more successful in preventing intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus than placebo.[] Nausea and vomiting are also common after neuraxial opioids. Nausea usually occurs within 4 h of injection and vomiting occurs soon thereafter.[]

During their 4 h stay at the PACU, there was no significant difference among studied groups in the incidence of nausea or vomiting. The sedation score and pain score were similar in the three studied groups.

Larger studies are required to investigate the use of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for prevention of pruritus, intraoperative and postoperative nausea, and vomiting in the obstetric population.

CONCLUSION

Nalbuphine and Ondansetron were found to be more effective than placebo for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus in women undergoing cesarean delivery, in spite of Nalbuphine is preferred than Ondansetron because it is not excreted in the breast milk. However, neither drug was effective in all patients.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest

REFERENCES

Pruritus Cesarean Delivery Fentanyl Dosis 10 15 2016

Pruritus Cesarian Delivery Fentanyl Dosis 10 15 20 Years Of Love